Abortion Conditioning by UN Style Engineering;
Poland CIA Prisons Exposed; Former IRS Whistleblower
Joe Banister
InfoWarsNightlyNews.net - April 3, 2012
Editor's Note:
InfowarsNightlyNews.net is working hard to
present a concise but informative news page
where you can find a wealth of each days news at
your fingertips. Occasionally you may find a
minor mistake such as the wrong day or date etc.
in a spot, but we try our best with limited
resources to give you a power packed daily page.
We hope you will find it to your benefit.
More Sickness From UN Social Engineers: Conditioning Children Into Accepting Abortions
Jurriaan
Maessen
Infowars.com
April 4, 2012
A subtle,
gradual indoctrination campaign has been rolled
out by the social engineers who steer the United
Nations- not in the course of years or decades,
but centuries- aiming to undermine free will,
slaughter it slowly, with the specific aim of
weakening the mental immune-system to the point
of having the mind accepting the most tyrannical
proposals. One of the results of this systematic
campaign, largely coordinated through UNESCO, is
the general acceptance of abortion as a viable
option when confronted with an unwanted
pregnancy. In the not too distant past the very
notion of terminating the unborn would have
outraged most people. Now we even see those who
call themselves conservative readily
entertaining the notion.
In an upcoming conference organized by the UN Commission on Population and Development, the UN has chosen to take the next step in the age-old plan to reduce the world’s population. We already know that when it comes to brainwashing the adult population the UN pulls out all the stops. This time the globalists openly involve children into the “discussion”- and by doing so breaking the most sacred of rules: whatever you do, the children are to be left alone.
(Continues below)Abortion
Conditioning: The UN's Sick Social Engineering
Agenda
The main theme of the upcoming forty-fifth session of the Commission on Population and Development is “Adolescents and youth”. The announcement put out by the UN consists mainly of the horrible and cynical euphemisms we have come to know from the ruling elite.
“Young people as much as all people share the human right to health, including sexual and reproductive health”, the document explains on page 3. Buried in the footnotes on the same page, the document explains what they mean when they say “young people”:
“young people: 10-24 year olds.”
This means that 10 year old children may be subjected to the UN’s population policies. We must not forget that by “reproductive health” the elite means “access to safe abortions”.
This is completely in line with a statement made not too long ago by the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). According to C-FAM the IPPF sent in their endorsement of the upcoming confab:
“laws that restrict young people’s access to sexual and reproductive health services, including parental or spousal consent laws” must either be removed or be refrained from being implemented. IPAS goes even further and argues that youth should be considered independent actors free of any obstacles that ignore their own “capacity to make informed decisions.”
In a 2007 publication by the UN Population Fund several proposals for pro-abortion propaganda are openly being discussed, among which:
“(…) reproductive health education in the schools; programmes for out-of school youths and early married girls, social marketing of condoms; using mass and entertainment media to disseminate messages (…)”.
And just when you think the UN must now surely have reached the upper limit of their criminal mindset, a document emerges proving you horribly wrong.
A 2009 draft report on ‘International Guidelines on Sexuality Education’ proposes desensitizing children as young as 5 to the concepts of masturbation and incrementally preparing them for the concept of aborting life. Although the report sparked a mild controversy in the beginning of September 2009, the final ‘Conference Ready Version’ of the abject report has not removed the proposals.
In case you missed it the first time, here it is again: UNESCO is intent on exposing 5 year old children to the reality of abortions and masturbation.
In the 2009 report authors Nanette Ecker and Douglas Kirby propose five different age ranges and just as many teaching methodologies for ‘sexuality education’ to confront children with. The reason given for all this is “HIV prevention” in order to achieve “Universal Access Targets.” According to Ecker and Kirby, the first thing to impress upon 5 year old children (under the header “Key Ideas”) is that “many different kinds of families exist around the world (e.g. two-parent, single parent, child-headed, guardian-headed, extended and nuclear families, same-sex couple parents, etc.).”
Proposed as “Key Ideas” to impress the impressionable with are, in the age range of 5 to 8:
1: “People receive messages about sex, gender and sexuality from their cultures and religions”.
2: “How harmful cultural/traditional practices affect health and well-being.”
3: “Difference between consensual sexual activity and forced sex.”
4: “Girls and boys have private body parts that can feel pleasurable when touched by oneself.”
5: “Touching and rubbing one’s genitals is called masturbation.”
6: “Some people masturbate and some do not.”
7: “Bodies can feel good when touched.”
8: “Some people are unable to care for a child.”
The last-mentioned “Key Idea” is obviously meant to prepare the children for the possibility of an abortion- for one of the “Key Ideas” mentioned in a later age range, 9 to 12, includes “definition of abortion” and “legal status of abortion locally and globally”. The learning curve is made complete when the authors propose, in the age range of 15 to 18, “advocacy to promote the right to and access to safe abortion.”
Here we
have it: at a very early stage children
are first being introduced to the idea that
“some people are unable to care for a child”;
in the next stage (9 to 12) the concept of
abortion is being introduced as a means to
resolve that issue. In the last stage (15
to18) the “Key Idea” is to explicitly advocate abortion.
Whatever one’s position in regards to the subject, everyone should agree that it is nothing less than a crime to desensitize children to such ideas at such an early age.
In a section called “common concerns about the provision of sexuality education”, the authors try to ‘debunk’ possible concerns about delivering this information to the very young. One of the concerns the authors toss up is “sexuality education deprives children of their ‘innocence’.”
To put the word innocence in between quotes says everything about the mindset behind these proposals. These sickening UNESCO sociopaths have the audacity to call into question a child’s innocence, proposing the school should inform the children about such matters at the age of 5.
“Parents”, according to the authors, “are often reluctant to engage in discussion of sexual matters with children because of cultural norms, their own ignorance or discomfort.”
In a twisted mind-warp the authors therefore propose taking upon themselves the role of the parents, and dangerous ones at that. To quote co-author Nanette Ecker: “We (…) need to start sexuality education young, such as teaching 5- to 8- year-olds the correct terminology about their bodies and how they work so they have the language to ask questions or report abusive, coercive behaviour or sexual violence.”
The World Health Organization shares this point of view. In the appendix to the above mentioned monstrosity can be read: “The World Health Organization (WHO) concludes it is critical that sexuality education be started early (…).”
“The International Guidelines”, say the authors, “will have immediate relevance for education ministers and their professional staff, including curriculum developers, school principals and teachers. However, anyone involved in the design, delivery and evaluation of sexuality education, in and out of school, may find this document useful.”
There is no more doubt, if ever there was any. The globalists, through their United Nations social engineers, are coming for the kids.
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerikJones
**********
Poles talk about CIA prison, breaking silence
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — For years, the notion
that Poland could allow the CIA to operate a
secret prison in a remote lake region was
treated as a crackpot idea by the country's
politicians, journalists and the public.
A heated political debate this week reveals how
dramatically the narrative has changed.
In a string of revelations and political
statements, Polish leaders have come closer than
ever to acknowledging that the United States ran
a secret interrogation facility for terror
suspects in 2002 and 2003 in the Eastern
European country.
Some officials recall the fear that prevailed
after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and defend
the tough stance that former U.S. President
George W. Bush took against terrorists.
But the debate is sometimes tinged with a hint
of disappointment with Washington, as if
Poland's young democracy had been led astray —
ethically and legally — by the superpower that
it counts as a key ally, and then left alone to
deal with the fallout.
Poland's Secret CIA Prisons Exposed
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerikJones
**********
Shining The Light Of Truth On The IRS with Former CID Agent Joe Banister
(Continues below)Joe Banister is the first and thus far only IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent ever to conduct, while serving as a special agent, an investigation into allegations that the IRS illegally administers and enforces the federal income tax. He respectfully reported the results of his investigation to his IRS superiors, up to and including the IRS Commissioner. Rather than address the legitimate concerns raised by one of their own distinguished investigators, his IRS superiors suspiciously refused to address the chilling evidence of IRS wrongdoing raised in his report and instead encouraged him to resign from his position. Observing that IRS management intended to cover up the deceit and illegal conduct alleged in his report, Banister chose to resign from his position so that he could report his findings to the American public. In effect, Banister had to resign from his position in order to abide by his oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution.
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerikJones
**********
Infowars News: 2012-04-03 (Full)
The INFOWARS NIGHTLY NEWS airs weeknights at 7 PM CENTRAL. Become a PrisonPlanet.tv subscriber and help support the broadcast as we try to reach a new threshold of audience reach in attempt to warn humanity about this time of great struggle.
**********
Alex Jones Live 2012-04-03 (Full)
On the Tuesday, April 3 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex confronts head-on the ongoing effort by the global elite to take down the Constitution. Obama directly criticized the Constitution on Monday as part of an orchestrated push to legitimize his unconstitutional Obamacare agenda. Minions of the global elite are now coming out of the woodwork in an effort to neuter the Second Amendment under cover of the inflammatory Trayvon Martin case. Alex covers these explosive issues and much more on today's info-packed show. Alex also takes your calls and takes a surprise call from Joe Banister.
Thanks to You Tube Channels Astonisher, ConspiracyScope and NWOTaser
InfoWarsNightlyNews.net is not connected with InfoWars.com except in the necessity to get out the message of liberty and freedom while standing in resistance against the criminal elite who have hijacked the constitution and are attempting to implement draconian world government laws to bring us into slavery 1984 style and beyond. Any comments, questions or copyright issues Email nwotaser@yahoo.com.
**********
