UK Queenie Launders Fortune in Drug Trafficking; Bernay's Propaganda; NDAA Constitutional Challenge; UN Agenda 21 Busting with Rosa Koire

InfoWarsNightlyNews.net - March 30, 2012

Editor's Note: InfowarsNightlyNews.net is working hard to present a concise but informative news page where you can find a wealth of each days news at your fingertips. Occasionally you may find a minor mistake such as the wrong day or date etc. in a spot, but we try our best with limited resources to give you a power packed daily page. We hope you will find it to your benefit.

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined the British queen’s bank, Coutts Bank, 8.75 million pounds for failing to carry out correct checks on “politically exposed persons” and prevent money laundering.
“The failings at Coutts were serious, systemic and were allowed to persist for almost three years. They resulted in an unacceptable risk of Coutts handling the proceeds of crime,” the FSA said in a statement posted on its official website.
The news comes less than a week after a fringe candidate for April’s French presidential election said the British queen owed her fortune to drugs money laundered by “Jewish bankers in The City.”
On 21 March, Jacques Cheminade, an independent presidential candidate running in the French election, said, “a part of the fortune of the Queen of England comes from drug trafficking.”
“No, not any property, there are several other sources. But it is a series of trafficking in which, yes, there is trafficking drugs,” Cheminade said on television LCP French National Assembly.
Known as the British queen’s banker, Coutts was criticised for “significant, widespread and unacceptable” failures, as described by Tracey McDermott, acting director of enforcement and financial crime.
“The size of the financial penalty demonstrates how seriously we view its failures,” McDermott said. (Continues below)

Majestic UK Queen Heroin Trafficking, Mysterious Booms Recorded & Ron Paul Rally Blacked Out

News/Links Articles Covered in this Segment

• We’re No. 1: In highest corporate taxes
• Mysterious Clintonville Booms Caught On Tape
• Army Officially Reprimands Soldier Who Spoke At Ron Paul Rally
• Ron Paul Rally in Wisconsin Draws 5,200. Media Blacks It Out
• Only Remaining MSM Reporter Covering Ron Paul Is Pulled
• Anderson Cooper Responds to Ron Paul’s Media Blackout Comments
• Are the Media Purposefully Ignoring Ron Paul?
• Politico’s Simon Says: “Ron Paul’s Victory in Iowa Caucuses May Help Romney”
• Ron Paul Doesn’t Exist
• Maddow: Does Ron Paul’s Delegate ‘Sneak Attack’ Strategy Undermine Voter Will?
• Sarah Palin Warns GOP: Don’t Ignore Ron Paul After Iowa

Propaganda's Founding Father Edward Bernays Exposed!

Researcher Derrin McBreen files a report on the manipulation of minds via propaganda.

Court Hears Arguments In Lawsuit Against Obama Indefinite Detention Law

Judge asks government lawyers if NDAA can be used on ordinary citizens

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
March 30, 2012

A Federal court in New York heard arguments Thursday for a preliminary injunction against the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the bill signed by Obama that legislates for the ‘indefinite detention’ of American citizens without trial.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest heard testimony from seven witnesses including MIT professor Noam Chomsky, Pentagon Papers source Daniel Ellsberg and Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, author and Middle East expert Chris Hedges.

Hedges himself filed the class action lawsuit claiming that the ‘indefinite detention’ provision of the legislation, otherwise known as the ‘Homeland Battlefield Bill’, could see him sent to Guantanamo Bay simply for doing his job, and at the very least would have a “chilling effect” on the work of journalists and activists. (Continued Below)

Witnesses Testify in Case Against NDAA

• Concern Over National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order a “Distraction”

The controversial legislation, signed into law by Obama on New Years Eve, allows American citizens to be abducted and held in a detention camp anywhere in the world without trial under section 1031. Although Obama indicated in a signing statement attached to the bill that he would not use it to indefinitely detain American citizens, it was the Obama administration itself that requested the provision be worded so it would apply to US citizens.

“If there is no rolling back of the NDAA law, we cease to be a constitutional democracy. Totalitarian systems always begin by rewriting the law,” Hedges said. “They make legal what was once illegal… Foreign and domestic subjugation merges into the same brutal mechanism. Citizens are colonized. And it is always done in the name of national security.”

Reuters reports that during the court session Thursday, the judge said she was skeptical that the plaintiffs would win a constitutional challenge to the act, but also said she wanted to “understand the meaning to the ordinary citizen.”

The legislation specifically says that any persons deemed to have “substantially supported” al-Qaida and the Taliban and “associated forces” may be incarcerated without trial.

Hedges told the court that “I don’t think we know what ‘associated forces’ are. That’s why I’m here.”

“I could be detained by the US military, held in a military facility – including offshore – denied due process and incarcerated until ‘the end of hostilities’ whenever that is,” Hedges said, adding that his work was already being hindered, because of fears that in speaking to sources that the government could deem hostile, he could be held accountable.

“Any kind of language in my presence that countenances violence against the US … given the passage of the NDAA, really terrifies me,” Hedges said.

Other witnesses included Kai Wargalla, a German organiser behind Occupy London, and a supporter of WikiLeaks, who noted that British police had recently included Occupy London alongside al-Qaida on a terrorism warning notice.

“We are on a terrorism list just under al-Qaida and this is what the section of the NDAA is talking about under ‘associated forces’,” she said.

Author and campaigner Naomi Wolf, who is in the process of becoming a plaintiff in the case, read testimony in court from Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir, who has said that she can no longer travel to the US for fear she could be arrested for her association with WikiLeaks.

“[The NDAA] provisions create a greater sense of fear since now the federal government will have a tool with which to incarcerate me outside of the normal requirements of the criminal law. Because of this change in the legal situation, I am now no longer able to travel to the US for fear of being taken into custody as as having ‘substantially supported’ groups that are considered as either terrorist groups or their associates,” said Jonsdottir in the statement read by Wolf.

Judge Forrest asked government lawyers if the terms “associated forces” and “substantially supported” could be interpreted in different ways.

“I can’t take the statute and strike it down for what it says,” judge Forrest said, “but can Hedges and others be detained for contacting al Qaeda or the Taliban as reporters?” she asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Torrance.

“What does substantially supported mean? How much is enough? When are someone’s activities substantial or insubstantial?” the judge asked.

Torrance responded by claiming that Hedges was “taking phrases out of context” and that the law would only be used against those found to have direct ties to al Qaeda and the Taliban.

“It is not proper for plaintiffs to come in and say they are chilled and what not.” Torrance added, saying that any support given to terrorists would “have to take place in the context of armed conflict” for it to be punishable under the NDAA.

Carl Mayer, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, has argued that the U.S. military has already undermined the alleged “armed conflict” requirement with the court martial of WikiLeaks source Pfc. Bradley Manning, who leaked classified documents to the organization but did not offer “armed” support.

“Those definitions are so broad and vague that they can encompass, journalists, lawyers, or even the judge, and they are undefined in the statute,” Mayer said.

“It gives the lie to what they’re doing,” Mayer added. “Now, they’re prosecuting Manning, who did not give armed support but leaked documents [to WikiLeaks], allegedly.”

“The Homeland Battlefield Law is as Orwellian as its name implies. America is not a “battlefield”; it is a democratic republic,” Mayer urged. “This law is unconstitutional because it violates the free speech and due process rights of American citizens.”

The judge did not make an immediate rule on the motion, according to the Reuters report.

In January, Hedges appeared on the Alex Jones show to discuss the lawsuit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HGQ14IPOOqY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=d8wOihr9WRw

UN Decides When We Go to War, Without Congressional Approval

• Libya: Barack Obama 'overruled top legal advice'

UN Planned Domination of Society Under Agenda 21 with Author Rosa Koire

Author of Agenda 21: Behind the Green Mask, Rosa Koire joins the program to expose the United Nations-led effort to transform and contain humanity.

Info News 2012-03-30 (Full)

Researcher and video producer Jon Bowne hosts his debut episode of the Infowars Nightly News, with a focus on global governance and the subversion of the U.S. Constitution, the secrets behind Ridley Scott's film Prometheus and the history of propaganda used to socially engineer the public. Author of Agenda 21: Behind the Green Mask, Rosa Koire joins the program to expose the United Nations-led effort to transform and contain humanity.

Alex Jones Live 2012-03-30 (Full)

On the Friday, March 30 edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex talks with Fritz Springmeier, author of Bloodlines of the Illuminati, an encyclopedia of rare, unbelievable information that exposes the dynasties that make up the global elite. The book is available at the Infowars store. Alex also talks with depleted uranium expert Doug Rokke, who served as a member of the 3rd U.S. Army Medical Command's Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical special operations team. Major Rokke has been subjected to ongoing retaliation from Department of Defense officials for reporting the adverse health and environmental effects of uranium weapons. Alex gets into economic issues today with broadcaster and film-maker Max Keiser. Prior to being a broadcaster, Keiser was a stock broker on Wall Street.

http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
http://twitter.com/#!/RealAlexJones
http://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerikJones

Thanks to You Tube Channels Astonisher, ConspiracyScope and NWOTaser

InfoWarsNightlyNews.net is not connected with InfoWars.com except in the necessity to get out the message of liberty and freedom while standing in resistance against the criminal elite who have hijacked the constitution and are attempting to implement draconian world government laws to bring us into slavery 1984 style and beyond.  Any comments, questions or copyright issues Email nwotaser@yahoo.com.