Charlotte Iserbyt: UN Corporate/Fascist Planned
Destruction of America
InfoWarsNightlyNews.net - February 13-14, 2012
Infowars.com
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Charlotte Iserbyt is the consummate whistleblower! Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration, where she first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America’s classrooms.
Iserbyt is a former school board director in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. She has also served in the American Red Cross on Guam and Japan during the Korean War, and in the United States Foreign Service in Belgium and in the Republic of South Africa.
Iserbyt is a speaker and writer, best known for
her 1985 booklet Back to Basics Reform or OBE:
Skinnerian International Curriculum and her 1989
pamphlet Soviets in the Classroom: America’s
Latest Education Fad which covered the details
of the U.S.-Soviet and Carnegie-Soviet Education
Agreements which remain in effect to this day.
She is a freelance writer and has had articles
published in Human Events, The Washington Times,
The Bangor Daily News, and included in the
record of Congressional hearings.
Others news covered includes:
Israel
accuses Iran of bombings in Georgia, India
while Iran rejects claims
Global Media Promotes Syrian
“Activist” Begging For Military Invasion
Police union demands info on
9/11 toxic debris
1984
World Bank Report Contemplates “Sterilization
Vans” & “Camps”
Establishment Media Hides Fact
That Big Pharma Killed Whitney Houston
Could
Ron Paul Still Win Maine?
Detroit Columnist Calls for
Sterilants in Drinking Water to Curb Poverty
Numbers
InfoWars Nightly News 2012-02-13 (Full)
The INFOWARS NIGHTLY NEWS airs weeknights at 7 PM CENTRAL. Become a PrisonPlanet.tv subscriber and help support the broadcast as we try to reach a new threshold of audience reach in attempt to warn humanity about this time of great struggle.
On the Friday edition of the Alex Jones Show, Alex talks with economist Lyndon LaRouche about the war brewing in the Middle East and the dismal state of the economy. Alex talks with founding member of The Houston Free Thinkers and radio show host Derrick Broze, who was assaulted by cops during the Houston Free Thinkers Free Show. Alex also covers the latest news on unfolding events in Syria and Iran as the globalist prepare their next war. Alex takes your calls.
Alex Jones Live 2012-02-13 (Full)
Thanks to You Tube Channels Astonisher, ConspiracyScope and NWOTaser
InfoWarsNightlyNews.net is not connected with
InfoWars.com except in the necessity to get this
message out. Some countries or individual servers
may be blocking InfoWars Sites but not this one. You
can find all the days articles and videos here at
InfowarNightlyNews.net should there be a block
elsewhere. We credit them with the info on this site
and repost all here because of their desires as well
as our desires for freedom and liberty. Any
comments, questions or copyright issues Email nwotaser@yahoo.com.
Obama Advisor’s Call For Global Tax Part Of UN Agenda For Transfer of Wealth
Obama himself introduced global tax bill in 2007 under UN auspices
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, February 13, 2012
Director of the White House’s national economic council Gary Sperling’s announcement that a plan for a “global minimum tax” is in the works continues the efforts of Barack Obama himself to oversee a massive transfer of wealth under the auspices of the UN.
The call also echoes similar rhetoric
out of the United Nations which recently announced
an agenda to impose a world tax on all financial
transactions to “help the poor”.
“We need a global minimum tax so that people have the assurance that nobody is escaping doing their fair share as part of a race to the bottom or having our tax code actually subsidized and facilitate people moving their funds to tax havens,” Sperling said today at an official meeting.
He added that more details about the proposal would be forthcoming before the end of the month.
The fact that President Barack Obama’s economic advisors are now pushing a global tax should not be a surprise given the fact that Obama himself introduced a bill when he was in the Senate, the Global Poverty Act of 2007, which would have committed 0.7% of America’s gross national product, or an additional $845 billion over 13 years in addition to existing foreign aid expenditures, for the purposes of “reducing global poverty.”
Obama’s bill was introduced with the aim of satisfying the “[U.N.] Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”
The United Nations has repeatedly tried but failed to piggy-back a global tax onto the back of climate change deals at successive summits in Copenhagen, Cancun and most recently in Durban.
The UN has also invoked the plight of
the world’s poor in its bid to establish a system of
global taxation.
The Commission on Social Development met earlier this month at UN headquarters in New York to advance the agenda for a world tax imposed on all financial transactions to fund a global model of social services that will provide “needy people” with a basic income, free healthcare, education and housing.
According to the report, the new global tax is designed to be a progressive scale, with higher earners paying more to help provide “all needy people with a basic income, healthcare, education and housing.”
The Obama administration’s plans for a global tax are in complete synergy with the United Nations agenda to achieve the same objective, which as a chilling 2010 UN blueprint made clear, revolved around a $45 trillion transfer of wealth from richer countries as part of a process that would enable the United Nations to build a structure of global governance in pursuit of a “Green World Order,” while lowering living standards in the west.
The timeline by which this goal had to be accomplished was June 2012, the date of the UN’s World Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio, which will mark the 20th anniversary since the notorious “Earth Summit” held in the same city.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Did Yale University plan to create an intellectually superior race of children to repopulate Britain after World War Two?
- Yale University only offered children of
Oxford and Cambridge university staff an
evacuation to the U.S.
- One evacuee has raised questions about the
experience asking did they want ‘to save the gene
pool?’
- Yale’s president James Angell was
‘a fanatic eugenicist in the worst meaning of that
word’
Jim Reilly
Mail Online
February 13, 2012
Yale University has been accused of trying to
create a super race of British children during War
World Two, it emerged today.
The university offered to evacuate children
of Oxford University staff in 1940, but it appears
there could have been a sinister motive behind
their seemingly kind offer.
There are now concerns that leaders of the eugenics movement at Yale University may have extended the invitation because they planned to repopulate a devastated Britain with a race of intellectually superior children.
‘Was Yale hoping to save the offspring of the British academic elite, protecting those 125 children because it saw them as future leadership class, especially deserving of preservation? asks Jonathan Freedland in The Sunday Telegraph.
Detroit Columnist Calls for Sterilants in Drinking Water to Curb Poverty Numbers
Proposal that aims to stop welfare dependents from “breeding poverty” would poison everyone with birth control spiked in public water.
Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
February 13, 2012
Water
fluoridation was always just a gateway for a greater
drugging of society.
The Detroit News has published a call to add contraceptives to the water supply, a dangerous and repugnant proposal for gross state power over life and death– all in the name of fighting the “breeding poverty” of the welfare class. Editorial page editor Nolan Finley writes:
“Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.“
This arrogant proposal– straight from the classic Eugenics model– will not curb the dependency in the welfare class. Instead, if implemented, it would cause a spike in the cancer rate, exacerbate the presence of gender-bending compounds in our common provisions, all while serving to legitimize nanny state control over all of us– not just those taking handouts or “breeding” irresponsibly.
In the first sense, Finley is airing class warfare arguments designed to play off segments of society under a larger climate of anger about the economic crisis or the socialistic takeover under ObamaCare (now couched in a debate about subsidized birth control). No doubt Detroit is plagued with problems, but this proposal is an elitist problem-reaction-solution ploy (whether the author realizes it or not) aptly geared at drawing ire from its readers about paying out the dole to the undeserving, all while instead cheering for their own destruction via drugging the water supply.
Why?
Let’s breakdown a few key points here:
1.) BIRTH CONTROL AND OTHER HORMONAL DISRUPTORS ARE ALREADY IN THE WATER & CAUSING PROBLEMS
A few years ago, investigations by the Associated Press and others underscored a little talked about problem. Hundreds of different pharmaceuticals and modern chemical compounds are ALREADY inadvertently polluting our drinking water. Runoff and toilet-to-tap systems allow excreted and disposed pharmaceuticals and pills of all sorts to enter right back into our water supply. These dangerous compounds are affecting all stratas of society– from wealthy, “responsible” families on down. Even if targeting the dependent class was morally acceptable and desirable, there’s no way to limit the exposure.
Toxic and gender-bending hormonal endocrine disruptors are destroying the environment and triggering cancer and other health problems. Spikes in prostrate cancer, breast cancer, thyroid problems and more are attributed to these chemicals, even as much of the media tries to downplay the effects as being at “safe levels.” Some ludicrously act as if turning a blind eye to hormonal pollution will make the problem go away.
Breast Cancer & The Environmental
Estrogen Connection
Instead, these artificial sex hormones, along with known carcinogens like arsenic, uranium, radium, and tetrachloroethylene not only violate the Safe Drinking Water Act, but coincide with increased reports of “‘intersex’ animals that live in or near the water: male alligators with undersize penises, male fish that produce eggs as well as sperm, male sea birds with female trait,” as Susan Kim at the Huffington Post writes.
2.) DETROIT OP-ED JUST REGURGITATING LONG-ESPOUSED COERCIVE POPULATION CONTROL MEASURES
The Detroit News‘ Nolan Finley is not presenting original ideas. Proposals to add sterilants to the water are not new; instead there are long-standing calls from eugenicists for covert mass sterilization, and this article gives reason to believe these poisonous ideas are gaining acceptance among a sheep-like and deeply divided population turned against itself.
Current White House science advisor John P. Holdren co-wrote the 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which lays out in detail a wide-array of coercive and voluntary-submission population control methods. One of the most drastic is that of “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods” (p. 787). Other drastic proposals include starving the poor by consolidating the global food supply and depriving nations who don’t meet population reduction goals of proportionate food rations (p. 942-3).
Putting sterilants in the water, though, dates back further to a 1969 memo sent in private from Planned Parenthood VP Frederick S. Jaffe to the Rockefeller-created Population Council’s President Bernard Berelson. It advocated drastic coercive measures including “Fertility control agents in water supply” and “encourage increased homosexuality.” But much of the one-page memo also aimed to dangle state benefits over expectant mothers to encourage abortions, sterilization and birth control through payments, tax credits and public housing policies. There is no doubting the racist tinge in this language, just as in this current editorial aimed at Detroit’s large minority populations.
Both Jaffe and Berelson are recipients of the Margaret Sanger Award for their population control work. Rockefeller-funded Sanger is a classical Eugenicist, and the founder of the Birth Control League that later transformed into Planned Parenthood. She was a key player in the highly inflammatory “Negro Project” (to reduce numbers in the black population) wherein she bluntly wrote in 1939 that “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
More recently, “bio-ethicists” like Oxford professor Julian Savulescu have called for adding other drugs to the water supply, too. Savulsecu, and many others like Irish Psychiatrist Dr. Moosajee Bhamjee, have advocated that lithium could be spiked in water to curb suicides, using the acceptance of water fluoridation to legitimize more and more mass drugging by the state.
Extremists like Dr. Eric Pianka have resurrected elite cries to sterilize everyone in the world, and only offer the antidote those willing to work for it. Plastic estrogen mimickers like Bisphenol-A were already making this possible, he indicated according to the transcript. Indeed, it is a very real proposal, that includes policies to implant a removable sterilant under the arm, reinstating the ability to reproduce if authorized by the state.
3.) IT’S ABOUT SCAPEGOATING THE POOR & DEPENDENT CLASSES, NOT THE ROOT CAUSES
The fall of Detroit has already been analyzed. It was victim to globalization and elite policies to de-industrialize America. In fact, Planned Parenthood’s National Medical Director, Dr. Richard Day, was one of the biggest advocates of this policy.
As ground zero of the U.S. manufacturing base, Detroit, like many other hotspots in the rust belt, was dismantled by trade policies building up new Asian partners and other exploitable, low wage countries. When Detroit was booming, the middle class was growing rapidly, and all groups in society had the chance to prosper– a prosperity that studies show typically correlates with smaller families and greater independence. Black, White, Hispanic– it doesn’t matter.
But now that the larger economic crisis has set off, it is again trendy to blame the dependent poor for all their abuses of the welfare system. Nevermind that the same elite class who advocated de-industrializing the West also purposely triggered the 2008 implosion.
Detroit News‘ Nolan Finley gives an example of a woman on welfare who has had 12 children. “The woman’s womb is a poverty factory,” Finley writes. “In the 1990s, Michigan considered penalizing women who had more babies while on welfare, but pro-life groups killed the idea out of fear it would lead to more abortions,” he also states.
The truth is that the crony-capitalists who control the government don’t want the dependent class to be self-supporting. They’ve just targeted the poor and minority communities because they are most vulnerable and least likely to defend against the attack. Ideally, this collectivist system wants everyone to be under state control- with allotments that allow government leverage over behavior. The end result is not a hostage-taxpayer upset over paying for welfare; it is a hyper-corrupt government that wants to decide who can breed, how many children they can have and if an individual’s life is even worth living. And no, that is not a joke or exaggeration.
It can be labeled socialism. It can be labeled communism. It can be labeled fascism, or a host of other loaded names. But under globalism, our nations are pursuing planned societies, and everything from the economy, the food supply, housing, education and our own bodies are to be regulated and apportioned by the “experts” in control. Fabian Socialist planner George Bernard Shaw embodies this plan, and takes it to the logical endpoint:
“Under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well.”
4. CLASSICAL EUGENICS EN VOGUE AGAIN?
There’s an
entire history underscoring how Eugenics was sold
to the population in the early parts of
the 20th century on the basis of relieving the
burden to taxpayers by reducing forcibly the number
of dependents. The historical photo posted here will
do enough to highlight the point– put pressure on
populations by propagandizing about the cost of the
poor to taxpayers.
Consider what the Eugenics Archives writes about Virginia’s Eugenical Sterilization Act, from the 1920s, one of more than 27 states who passed Eugenics laws based on Cold Spring Harbor head Harry Laughlin’s Model Law: “It was adopted as part of a cost-saving strategy to relieve the tax burden in a state where public facilities for the “insane” and “feebleminded” had experienced rapid growth.” Hundreds of other pro-Eugenics publications of the era made the same, or similar, pitches– to save taxpayer money.
Detroit’s Nolan Finley has undoubtedly channeled this sentiment again. But the intention is not really to save public money; it is to give the state more power.
Besides, what cost would intentionally adding sex hormones to the water have on all of us? Just think about the dangers of this proposal. How much would be saddled on taxpayers once governments were sued for inducing cancer?
Again, fighting dependency is not the true intent. The same Jaffe-Berelson discussed above that hoped to reduce U.S. fertility by sterilizing the water also advocates “Discouragement of private home ownership.” If this was about cutting the number of government dependents, why would this policy be on the books?
Instead, it implies that the “targets” of population reduction should be UNDER government housing, so that benefits can be dangled over those in need– forcing a decision between bearing children and getting enough money to survive.
But go ahead: blame the indigent, dependent poverty class for our problems. No doubt it could score some political points. Meanwhile, some of us are facing up to the war against humanity itself.
